Retail's 2019 – the Stuart version
Retail’s 2019 – the Stuart version
Sat, 12/28/2019 – 05:53
- Some wins, a lot of losses and more in the retail world of 2019.
As in previous years, 2019 was a turbulent one for the retail sector as more classic names hit trouble in a fast-changing market. But there were some success stories amid the doom and gloom. Hereâ€™s my 2019 scorecard of retail omni-channel transformation in action (or inaction – delete as applicable).
Over time, Old Navy’s value creation levers, business model and customers have increasingly diverged from our specialty brands. That divergence to me is now clear. And we think the best way for each company to grow and meet the evolving needs of our customers is to allow them to pursue tailored strategies separately.
This will be looked back upon as a tipping-point year for The GAP, one way or another. The groupâ€™s three flagship brands – Old Navy, Banana Republic and GAP – once again enjoyed mixed fortunes, with the lower-end Old Navy easily outperforming its counterparts. It was still a surprise, although a savvy move, when in March, GAP CEO Art Peck announced that Old Navy would be cut free from the weight of the other two brands, which would then fly under the flag of a new entity called (rather embarrassingly) NewCo. At the time, Peck was going to head up NewCo, but by the time another set of grim quarterly numbers loomed last month, he was out of The GAP completely. Peck had been a great advocate of the need for digital transformation within the retail sector. What happens next remains to play out in 2020, but itâ€™s clearly going to be a pivotal year in one direction or another.
My take – Ouch!
Lowes vs Home Depot
Our rollout is largely on track and we’re realizing benefits. It’s just taking a little longer than our original assumptions. We have foundational IT work streams supporting many of our strategic initiatives that will significantly enhance our ability to serve our customers in an interconnected way. Much of this IT work requires unwinding our legacy systems and that has proven to be more complex than originally anticipated.
In the US home improvement market, there are two main contenders – Lowes and Home Depot. Both have digital champions at their helms, both are engaged on massive omni-channel retail transformation programs and both ran into problems in 2019 as their corporate DIY makeovers fell behind schedule. What happened to both firms serves as a timely reminder that transformation programs are a long game, not a quick hit to paper over the cracks. And as with home DIY itself, their respective slower-than-expected progress emphasises the importance of doing the early foundational prep work and getting that right. Sort out the ancient plumbing before you start fretting about installing the new jacuzzi. Nonetheless, both firms have thought through their fix-up plans and have invested heavily in in-house skills to deliver them. 2019 might have been a year when schedules needed to be adjusted and expectations modified, but when did a major building project ever run entirely to plan?
My take – 2020 will be a year when both retailers step up delivery and the results should start to become more apparent. The slowdown of 2019 isnâ€™t a long term concern for either party.
- Digital DIY – getting the prep work right has slowed down Home Depot’s digital do-over, admits CEO
- Digital DIY – how Lowe’s underestimated the complexity of its e-commerce challenge
Bed, Bath & Beyond
Together, the Board and the management team are challenging our current value proposition and operating model to take on a more holistic approach to the transformation while also maintaining a focus on delighting our customers and delivering long term value to shareholders.
That mouthful of calorie-free word salad from Mary Winston, interim CEO at Bed, Bath & Beyond, sums up everything thatâ€™s been wrong with the retailer, whose annus horribilis in 2019 has been one of the most extreme in the industry.Â Her predecessor as CEO had spent years trying to convince the market and his shareholders that omni-channel transformation was underway and coming soon, just a little bit longer, maybe another quarter or two, yada yada yada. Something had to give and in 2019 it spectacularly did. Temares was out after investors rebelled against a â€œdetached from reality managementâ€� and a hostile takeover was looming. By year end, Winston was talking up data analytics as a savior – well, maybe, butâ€¦ – and promising that a new permanent CEO is just around the corner. Whoever is brave enough to take on this hot mess of a company has his or her work cut out.
My take – still no dressing on the word salad.
- Bed, Bath & Beyond’s omni-channel transformation needs more proof points as “detached from reality” management comes under fire
- Word salad around omni-channel transformation isn’t going to bowl anyone over at Bed, Bath & Beyond
- Bed, Bath & Beyond looks to customer data analytics to reverse digital and offline retail decline
Marks & Spencer
When we drafted the statement and first showed it to my non-executive directors, the headline was “transformation beginning to bear fruit.” And the non-execs said, â€˜Not a lot of fruit in these resultsâ€™.
A typical piece of candor from Archie Norman, Chairman at UK retail institution Marks & Spencer, as the firmâ€™s omni-channel program once again failed to deliver on the promises made for it in 2019. CEO Steve Rowe emulated his colleagueâ€™s mea culpa mantra by highlighting progress followed by lack of progress – a ying for every yang. For example, online traffic in the most recent quarter was up 8% year-on-year, but itâ€™s not traffic thatâ€™s coming direct to M&S, where search engine optimization is poor and the website is in major need of an upgrade. So all doom and gloom for another year then? Well, no, not really. The bloodletting of another round of store closures hangs over 2019 like a dark shadow, but thereâ€™s light around the corner, perhaps, and that light is called Ocado. After years of sticking its corporate head in the sand about the potential of online grocery delivery, M&S finally teamed up with online platform provider Ocado with the Â£750 million promise of a joint-venture that will bring M&S food to customers doors from September of next year. Yes, M&S is buying its way into the game and at a price that spooked some analysts and investors, but itâ€™s a roll of the dice thatâ€™s taken too long to happen already. This could be the last, best chance for a firm whose decline has been painful to watch for so many years.
My take – September canâ€™t come quick enough.
- M&S pays Ocado Â£750 million for an online grocery ‘ready meal‘
- M&S’s online mea culpa as transformation program stumbles
- M&S,Â Co-Op and Dunnhumby discuss the opportunities and risks of AI in retail
The market is at an inflection point – now is our timeâ€¦we have many opportunities to create future valueâ€¦the story has only just begun.
In 2020, all things being equal, Ocado will become the UKâ€™s largest listed tech company. Thatâ€™s assuming that a decision by regulators to de-designate the firm as a grocery company is actioned, which looks pretty much inevitable as it plays to the messaging that Ocadoâ€™s management has been preaching for a long time. That said, 2019 has been a year of mixed fortunes for Ocado. The tie-up with Marks & Spencer gave the firmâ€™s share price a welcome boost and the terms of the deal certainly benefit Ocado most obviously in the short term. But a major fire in one of its Customer Fulfilment Centers caused a lot of damage and impacted on the firmâ€™s bottom line in 2019. On a more upbeat note, initial pilots of one hour delivery in London have proven to be a big success and 2020 should see more investment there. And as the M&S relationship takes shape, Ocado got a powerful piece of endorsement from another partner, Kroger.
My take – the fires are out on 2019 and 2020 looks like it has a lot of promise.
- Massive losses, growing tech spend and an M&S elephant in the room, but Ocado CEO says this is “our time”
- Ocado singed by warehouse fire, but partner deals and “immediacy delivery” bode well
- How Kroger is learning e-commerce lessons from Ocado with some big expectations to deliver on
Itâ€™s clear that not all our customers are ready for a totally till-free store.
The belated realisation by UK grocery chain Sainsburyâ€™s that customers like having a cashier behind the checkout brought smiles to many lips in 2019. The firm had boasted about how transformative to the customer experience an automated, self-service, till-free shop would be. It did indeed transform the customer experience – they hated it! It was a timely reminder to all retailers that just because you have the technology to do something, that doesnâ€™t mean that you should do it. But that minor humiliation wasnâ€™t the biggest problem that Sainsburyâ€™s faced in 2019 as its planned merger with ASDA hit regulatory rocks and was axed. But by year end, the firm had dusted itself off and was talking up its tech investment as a competitive differentiator in the UKâ€™s increasingly febrile grocery sector where low-cost challengers such as Lidl and Aldi are making significant inroads. Perhaps the most significant tech gambit – and certainly one to watch closely in 2020 – was a tie-up with Google Cloud and Accenture to build out its real-time analytics capabilities.
My take – 2019 didnâ€™t turn out as planned, but Sainsburyâ€™s remains a prime example of a retail tech innovator and now one that has been reminded that digital transformation needs to go at the customerâ€™s paceâ€¦
- Sainsbury’s chases digital differentiators after ASDA merger plan is trashed
- Sainsbury’s till-free retreat is a timely reminder to retailers that digital transformation goes at the customers pace
- Sainsbury’s and Google – unexpected cloud platform in bagging area
- Sainsbury’s ‘Guttenberg moment’ – applying data science to bolster customer service levels
Our goal remains to offer our product wherever, however and whenever our customer wants to shop, whether it be through our digital or physical channels. Our e-commerce channel represents over 90% of direct sales and with our strong heritage we remain committed to building upon our digital capabilities and shopping experience across our business.
One of the success stories – seemingly – of 2019 was Lands End. For the past few years, articles about the retailer have had headlines that have written themselves, about cliff edges and lack of solid ground. But this year it does look like the firm has taken several steps back from the edge with tech investment a major enabler of this (still tentative) recovery. Thereâ€™s been a successful ERP rollout, a ramping up of data analytics and AI tech to get a better understanding of customer behavior and 2020 will see work underway on an Enterprise Order Management program. Whether the turnaround can continue in 2020 remains to be seen, but Lands End does exit 2019 in better condition than it came in, which in the current retail climate is an achievement in its own right. (Just stop saying â€˜uni-channelâ€™ when you mean omni-channel!)
My take – Land ahoy!
- Is Lands End’s cliffhanger crisis over as retailer finds firmer ground for uni-channel growth?
- Listening to the customer’s digital signals – Lands End’s data scientists focus on search is paying off
- Lands End – digital innovator once more, but not chasing ‘pretty’ stores?
Every piece of our strategy is working and it’s working together.
Thatâ€™s not a boast that many retail CEOs can make, but Targetâ€™s Brian Cornell can justifiably risk such public self-praise as his firm soars above all others in 2019 as a bellweather of omni-channel success – and a success thatâ€™s been built around his belief in the concept of â€˜store-as-hubâ€™ in a digital retail economy. That wasnâ€™t a popular thesis a few years back, he points out, but it was one that has now been vindicated. Targetâ€™s quarterly numbers continued to keep Wall Street happy this year, but itâ€™s to stats like a 31% year-on-year increase in online sales and a $5 billion digital sales run-rate that Cornell is most keen to point. And all of this current success comes from starting early, he argues, pitching a timeline of foundation work in 2016, investment planning in 2017, delivery acceleration in 2018 and ramped-up adoption in 2019. As for 2020â€¦
My take – totally on target.
- Is Target the easiest place to shop in the US as CEO boasts he was right about omni-channel vision?
- Delivering digital growth – how Target’s store-as-hub strategy paid off
- Putting the store at the core of Target’s digital fulfilment success story
- The need for speed – how Target is meeting the ‘same-day’ expectations of omni-channel retail customers
We see the future as a frictionless experience across stores and e-commerce, but we have more work to do as customers raise their expectations, competition persists, and the omni-retail story continues to evolve.
It wasnâ€™t the easiest of years for the worldâ€™s largest retailer. Walmart had problems internationally and at home in the US where the future direction of its e-commerce business fell into question even as the threat from Amazonâ€™s ambitions in the grocery space ramped up. The company saw its plans to offload its UK ASDA arm to Sainsburyâ€™s crash and burn amid regulatory rejection. It had problems with its passage to India, a major strategic priority for growth, where an increasingly protectionist government has seemed intent on putting more and more barriers in the way of foreign interlopers. At the start of the year, the domestic e-commerce business looked to be the bright spot for Walmart, but by the time the summer came around there was public dissent there too as rumors circulated of a $1 billion loss and a need for a major course correction to get the omni-channel balance between online and offline focus right. That was made particularly urgent by 2019â€™s shift towards a â€˜need for speedâ€™ as Walmart and Amazon competed on fulfilment and delivery options. The retailer leaves 2019 still as the global behemoth it entered the year, but the challenges it faces in 2020 have been exposed for scrutiny.
My take – 2020 needs to see Walmart taking back the agenda.
- Walmart hits road bumps in UK and India, but e-commerce soars in the US
- One day logistics challenge delivers up a new front in the omni-channel retail war between Walmart and Amazon
- Walmart needs to make some e-commerce adjustments as $1 billion loss is rumored
- Walmart restructure seeks a more integrated omni-channel balance
Clothing-as-a-Service – Macyâ€™s, JC Penney, Hudsonâ€™s Bay, Banana Republic,Â Urban Outfitters
With the exponential growth in re-sale there is no doubt that demand for affordable luxury is at an all time high. There is an emotional thrill that comes with finding a high quality second-hand product for much less. While there are more second-hand shoppers than ever before, we will continue to test and evaluate how this resonates with our customers.
2019 saw an interesting increase in the number of fashion retailers exploring the ideas of â€˜Clothing-as-a-Serviceâ€™ and â€˜re-commerceâ€™ – AKA selling second hand clothes. JC Penney and Macyâ€™s – both of whom continued to flounder in 2019 – tied up with thredUP to roll out pop-up second hand outlets inside their own stores, the theory being that bargain-hungry consumers will come in search of high-end used fashion and can then be cross-sold to for full price items. Itâ€™s not a bad theory – the 2019 Resale Report from analysts GlobalData found that re-sale has grown 21 times faster than the wider retail apparel market over the past three years. Meanwhile the idea of renting rather than owning clothes is expanding beyond the tuxedo and prom dress markets.Â Banana Republic is building its own rental business on a subscription digital platform from CaaStle, as is Urban Outfitters with its Nuuly initiative. Meanwhile Hudsonâ€™s Bay has taken a stake in the Clothing-as-a-Service space by essentially paying a specialist firm, Le Tote, to take its troubled Lord & Taylor brand off of its hands while securing a 25% share of the Le Tote in the process. Innovation or desperation? Time will tell.
My take -Â expect to hear a lot more about such alternative retail models in 2020
- Can ‘re-commerce’ stitch up a retail revival? Macy’s and JC Penney fashion some second-hand omni-channel thinking
- Hudson’s Bay’s digital retail gambit with Le Tote could be just the omni-channel CaaS in point that it needs
- Can ‘Clothing-as-a-Service’ fashion a future for retail in a Subscription Economy?
Image credit – Yucil Tellici via Freeimages